Follow Me on Twitter
Find us on Facebook
You are here: Home Blog Hella Bus Blog

Hella Bus Blog

Your place for all things Buslandia!

Jay Inslee Supports Gay Marriage: Potential Wedge Issue in 2012?

Posted by at Jul 05, 2011 04:24 PM |

ArielleBloggingHeadResized.jpgJust days after officially launching his campaign for 2011 Washington state governor, Democratic Congressmen Jay Inslee has taken a powerful stand on what may prove an important issue in the 2012 gubernatorial election.   Specifically, Inslee announced that he now supports the legalization of gay marriage.

While he has been a long-time supporter of same-sex civil unions, his stance on gay marriage remained unclear until now. During a rally in Spokane last week Inslee explained his stance on gay marriage stating, “‘I believe that no government…should deny any of my fellow Washingtonians the right to have what I have, which is a stable, committed, meaningful relationship. So I’m going to support the legalization of that equality in the state of Washington.”


Inslee’s stance on the issue contrasts him from that of his opponent, Republican candidate and current Attorney General Rob McKenna who opposes the legalization of gay marriage.

Gay marriage may prove a wedge issue in the 2012 gubernatorial elections, particularly given that for the first time the majority of Americans now support legalizing same-sex marriages.  As we have seen in the recent legalization battle in New York and Governor Cuomo, the strong support and prioritization of gay marriage by the governor can play a crucial role in the passage of such a bill. Keep your eyes peeled, gay marriage will likely prove an issue to watch over the ensuing year and a half.

Goldfish and Guinea Pigs = Go To Jail in San Francisco

Posted by at Jul 05, 2011 02:49 PM |

GabeBloggingHeadResized.jpgLast July, San Francisco's Commission of Animal Control and Welfare decided that the sale of dogs, cats, hamsters, mice, rats, chinchillas, guinea pigs, birds,snakes and lizards warranted a trip to jail.

The law was justified under the charge that people who purchase pets tend to be more likely to mistreat or neglect their furry/scaly/gooey(?) friends as compared to those who adopt from shelters or rescue groups.  I really have no idea if this is true, but it's not surprising that it took place in San Francisco, our nation's supreme bastion of political correctness. They weren't the first though - West Hollywood, CA already carried out a similar ban.

San Francisco's pet ban was suspended last year after it was expanded from cats and dogs to critter with fur or feathers, but now the commission is back at it with a spiffy new name - the Humane Pet Acquisition Proposal. Even though last years proposal was sidelined in large part because of its inclusion of everything from great danes to geckos, the new proposal takes it up even further to include fish. That's right. San Francisco might ban the sale of goldfish for "humane" purposes.

The commissions goal of eliminating impulse buys, and reducing abuse and neglect is admirable, but the implications for SF pet shops potential pet owners that might turn their eye towards the South Bay or Oakland will be fascinating to keep tabs on.

What does 20% mean to you?

Posted by at Jul 05, 2011 02:40 PM |

PeterBloggingHeadresized.jpgWhat does 20% mean to you? If you're a UW student, 20% probably makes you think of one thing: your tuition.

There's been a lot of grand-scale harrumphing about the recent budget—the one that included major cuts to social services, education, and more—approved by the legislature, but I'm sure a lot of Hella Bus readers are wondering how that budget will affect them. Well, if you're a UW student, you've probably figured out how you're going to be affected: to return to school this fall, you're going to have to pay almost $2,000 more in tuition than you did last year. The UW's board of regents voted last week to increase tuition fees by 20% to fill the gap left by the cuts to the UW's state funding.


Of course, if you're a student at UW, that's probably not news to you. Tuition increased by 14% each of the previous two years.  UW students, to their credit, have been actively involved in the process decision making process. Students wrote letters, testified in front of the Legislature, and staged rallies to contest the cuts.  Unfortunately, the cuts remained for a host of reasons.

Quite simply, that sucks. Everyone, including the regents, seems to appreciate that fact. "None of us like this," said regent Sally Jewell. Some students pointed to the fact that the UW's regents are successful and mostly wealthy folks unlike the students who would be most affected by the cuts, but it's safe to say that the regents care about the UW and its students. Most of them got to where they are because of their UW education.

That doesn't change the fact that an extra $2,000 in tuition makes for a large financial burden for lots of folks. But the school's in a tough place right now—on the same day that the regents approved the tuition increase, they also announced that UW staff would be laid off.

If there's any silver lining to all this (and even if you squint, a silver lining is hard to see), it's that the regents are using the new revenue to increase financial aid and restore programs that had been eliminated in earlier rounds of cuts (the U has had to drop a lot of courses from its curriculum recently due to revenue decreases). The regents do want to put the 20% towards programs that will benefit undergrads.

The increased emphasis on financial aid will help low-income students continue to afford the U (although the competition will surely increase for this money), but many students may find themselves in the perilous netherworld in between qualifying for financial aid, and being able to afford the new tuition rates.  Check out some student perspectives on the cuts here.

Conor McLean, president of the Associated Students of UW, put it best: "The best form of financial aid is low tuition." Higher ed exists in a broad ecosystem of cuts to public funding, but it represents a particularly impactful result of state budget cuts.  More barriers to access to higher ed does no one any good.  Let's hope that this state of ours can figure out a way to get tuition back to where it was. Or lower.

A coalition of students headed up by UW's BARK Against Budget Cuts are continuing to build momentum in order to influence budget discussions in the coming years. Find out what they're up to and get involved.

Basset Hounds in Flight

Posted by at Jul 05, 2011 10:05 AM |

We're a little behind on this one, but if you haven't seen these photos of Basset Hounds running - please indulge:


Nothing is More Patriotic than Alliteration

Posted by at Jul 01, 2011 05:40 PM |

Courtesy of 2011 Summer Fellows Alec Stannard and Amber Rose Jimenez -

At the Bus, we take your health very seriously. Here’s our prescription for a fantastic 4th of July weekend:

  1. Encourage a healthy constitution by getting young voters more involved in the political process.
  2. Sit back, relax, and have a sip of some home brewed iced- (liber)tea as you take a minute to  Pledge to Vote.
  3. Get a strong dose of freedom at Gas Works Park during the Family Fourth at Lake Union celebration. You can even register to vote with our summer fellows, who will be doing it big all over the park.

Freedom, fellows and fireworks—does it get any better than this?


BAM. It just did.

Name this Board Member

Posted by at Jul 01, 2011 05:26 PM |

First person to name this Washington Bus board member wins a signed copy of the photo:


Hella Bus Official Tunnel Guide

Posted by at Jul 01, 2011 03:35 PM |
Filed under: , ,

The Alaskan Way Viaduct. Apparently about to collapse at any moment.

PeterBloggingHeadresized.jpgChances are, if you follow Seattle politics in the slightest you dream about process you've heard a lot about the tunnel. Ever since (and partly because) Mike McGinn was elected mayor, the tunnel has been the most talked-about and controversial issue in Seattle politics. The mayor has made blocking the tunnel the highest priority of his administration. That political effort spawned a referendum that will appear on Seattle ballots for the August 16th primary, and you're going to hear a lot about the initiative and the tunnel itself. You will also probably be confused, because a lot of stuff has already happened and you might have missed some of it (or you might have shut off from hyperbolic overload).


Now we realize that the last thing Seattle needs is another news outlet speaking exclusively in tunnel, so we're offering a thorough overview for those unfamiliar or to catch you up to speed - and from here on out, we pinky swear not to obsess over it. So, with no further ado, here is Hella Bus's official Story of the Tunnel:

The tunnel story starts at 10:54 A.M. on February 28, 2001. It was at that time that I was in my sixth grade science class thinking about dinosaurs the Nisqually earthquake struck Puget Sound. The tremblor didn't cause too much damage to the area, but an inspection of the Alaskan Way Viaduct revealed that the highway wouldn't be able to withstand a more significant bad vibration. Seattleites and their officials, terrified about the prospect of a collapsing concrete pancake of death (and blithely unaware of its potential as a cult horror film), started to debate ways to replace the viaduct.

Why does this matter? Replacing the viaduct is an opportunity to make dramatic, positive changes to Seattle's city plan. After all, the viaduct is - objectively - an ugly, intimidating waste of space. It creates an uncomfortable and unfortunate  barrier between Downtown and the waterfront—nobody wants to go for a stroll in a bunker. (Semi-tangential note—the City is entertaining lots of awesome ideas for what to do with the space when the viaduct comes down.)

Everyone in Seattle understands the opportunity that viaduct replacement creates, and each replacement option drew supporters who thought that their choice would best advance their waterfront vision. Eventually, three options emerged (and they are listed in no particular order here). The first option was to simply tear down the viaduct. The second option was to tear down the viaduct and replace it with another elevated highway of equal or larger capacity. The third option was to build a cut-and-cover tunnel—a shallow tunnel created by tearing up the street, digging underneath, and covering it up with a surface that can be built on (visualize the part of I-5 that goes under the Washington State Convention Center in Downtown Seattle).

After lengthy debate and several false starts, the Seattle City Council eventually chose to hold a referendum on viaduct replacement, which was held in March 2007 as a special election. Seattleites promptly rejected both the cut-and-cover tunnel and the new elevated highway. Shit. City and state officials went back to the drawing board. Eventually, folks (especially former Seattle Mayor Greg Nickels) came up with a deep bore tunnel. That construction process would use what a layperson might call a "giant power drill" to dig a freeway tunnel hundreds of feet under the waterfront.

Local and state officials, like Governor Christine Gregoire and Nickels, eventually coalesced around the plan, but strong opposition abounded. Anti-tunnel folks found their leader in Mike McGinn, who eventually was elected mayor due in part to his staunch anti-tunnel advocacy (which briefly, and controversially, was recanted during the latter stages of the general election).

That brings us up to the present day and the current tunnel status quo: the City and the State have reached agreements to construct the tunnel despite McGinn's best efforts, which include putting final approval for the tunnel on the ballot this August during the primary. Referendum 1 (as the tunnel referendum is titled) will ask voters whether or not they approve of the City Council moving forward with the tunnel contracts, all of which have been signed and approved by the City. The cliffs notes version: if the vote is for the "Yes" option, then the pro-tunnel folks (represented in the campaign by Let's Move Forward) claim victory. If the vote is for the "No" option, then the anti-tunnel folks (represented by Protect Seattle Now) will do an endzone dance.

The question posed in the referendum sounds like a big deal, but it may not be. The contracts have all been signed, as noted above, and a contract is a contract- it would be difficult for the City to withdraw from agreements already in place with the State and contractors. If the City were to actually renege on the agreements they made with engineers, surveyors, and builders, then they'd probably be in for a whole boatload of lawsuits. Still, if the Referendum comes down overwhelmingly No, then we might see some real changes in the status quo. The City Council would have to think about the ramifications of broad-based public opposition to the tunnel and potential legal challenges from the anti-tunnel folks, who aren't exactly shy to mobilize.

So that's where the battle lines lie. I honestly have no idea who has an advantage right now: the pro-tunnel folks have formidable support from the traditional political establishment and most of our elected officials, but Seattle voters did vote down the original proposals for viaduct replacement. Stay tuned for the next episode... it's coming your way this August.


Posted by at Jul 01, 2011 01:29 PM |

...that's the tuition hike facing University of Washington student's this year - the largest in the university's history. Whoah.

Suffice to say, nobody's happy.

We'll be following up with more extensive coverage, but here are some Bullet Points:

  • The increase owes significantly to the 50% cut in state funding towards higher education over the past three years.
  • For the first time, the UW board of regents was granted tuition setting authority.
  • Interim president Phyllis Wise said on KUOW that half of the revenue raised from tuition will go towards student aid and the other half is aimed towards restoring high demand programs.
  • Administrative costs went largely unaddressed in the discussion.

We'll be discussing it in depth next week, hit us up if you want to share your perspective!

Gabe's Picks - The Triumphant Return

Posted by at Jul 01, 2011 09:47 AM |

GabeBloggingHeadResized.jpgHello all, and - after a year's hiatus - welcome back to Gabe's Picks!

Over the past 11 months, we have witnessed the rapid ascendence of the Odd Future crew, Weezy F. Baby's release from Rikers, Kanye's infatuation with ballet, the rise in popularity of dubstep (womp womp anyone?), and Lil' B release an album titled "I'm Gay" (he's not). Detox was given another release date... and predictably was delayed again.

This week, I'm not going to focus on new music music, but instead will highlight a few artists that have been in constant rotation for my past year sans Hella Bus. Attending school in Southern California gave me the opportunity to hear a ton of great tunes, as well as see shows in LA (not easy without a car as I'm sure Dan the Transportation Man would lament). Having heard so much new music and seen so many shows, there is absolutely no way I could write a comprehensive 'best of' list of the past year, but screw it - it's worth a try.

Below is a list of the best shows I have witnessed since last June. There's a bunch of hella good music in here, and their presence on the post gives them the official Gabe Meier seal of approval.  Over the coming week, I'll be delivering some of my favorite albums, songs, and artists direct to your digital door. Without further ado, here are the some of the best live sets around:

1.) Sleigh Bells @ Sasquatch Music Festival

When the Sasquatch schedule was first released, I was disheartened to see that Sleigh Bells was only scheduled for a 30 minute set. After seeing videos of their performance at the MTV Woody Awards, and hearing rave reviews from across the interwebs, the Brooklyn duo was at the top of my list of bands to see at Squatch. While the duo of Alexis Krauss and Derek Miller only graced the stage for half an hour, I don't know how much more of their blistering set I could take. Faced with a wall of strobe lights and speakers in the dance tent, the Sasquatch crowd moshed, crowdsurfed, and collectively lost its mind from the opening (Black Sabbath's "Ironman") to the final thrash of Erdman's guitar ("Infinity Guitars"), the duo dominated the stage, and put on the best live set I've seen in recent memory.

2.) Major Lazer @ Sasquatch Music Festival 2011

The DJ duo of Diplo and Switch, together Major Lazer, were the final act scheduled for the dance tent, and the second to last act of the entire festival. Following dubstep maestro Skrillex's torrid set, Switch and Diplo took the stage in front of a crowd ready to get down, but also fearing the end of an incredible weekend. The two DJ's started off the set with their classic dancehall sound, but by 15 minutes in, they were blasting Flux Pavillion's remix of DJ Fresh's "Gold Dust", and feeding a dubstep hungry crowd with a few Rusko and Skrillex bangers. Diplo and Switch knew exactly what to play, and constantly switched the tempo of the show, going from hip hop (Rick Ross's "BMF") to reggae to their own classic hits ("Percolate" and "Hold The Line"), all while hypeman Skerrit Bwoy daggered. While its hard to list a DJ set this high on the list, the fluidity and song choice in the Major Lazer set, along with Skerrit Bwoy's antics, made the show seem like much more than a standard EDM show.

3.) Murs @ Paid Dues Festival 2011

Heading into Paid Dues, I was most excited to see Black Star perform their self titled album, but also more than ready to finally see the enigma Lil' B in the flesh, one of my favorite artists Blu, and Houston legend Bun B. Murs has always been one of my favorite artists, but his music never came across to me as if it would translate well to a live show. Boy was I wrong. Murs not only put on the best set at his own festival, but also probably the funnest hip hop show I've ever been to. Bringing genuine emotion and enthusiasm, Murs displayed his diverse discography (say that 10 times fast) in a set that went 45 minutes over its allotted time. Highlights included the touching "First Love Blues", "Everything", and a remix he did with the Italian electro house duo Crookers called "To Protect and Entertain" (the older hip hop crowd didn't seem to appreciate that one as much).

4.) Glitch Mob @ Claremont Colleges

Performing on the second floor of a parking garage, glitch hop masters Glitch Mob brought an energy, and force that I never expected to witness when I first arrived on my quiet college campus. From the start of the show ("Animus Vox") to the rawkus finish (a remix of "Seven Nation Army" by The White Stripes), the trio brought the bass in a venue that was literally shaking from start to finish. The crowd was entirely made up of college students, and the energy and intensity was evident. Utilizing laptops, Lemur MIDI controllers, and drums, edIT, Boreta, and Ooah delivered their signature glitch sound with a vengeance in a show that could hardly be called a DJ set.

5.) Blue Scholars @ Claremont Colleges

Since I first saw Geo and Sabzi throw down at Bumbershoot 2006 or '07 (the Kanye year), I have seen them perform at all sorts of different venues across the Northwest. When I heard they were performing at an auditorium on my campus, I was excited, but not expecting anything more than their standard set. The show opened with The XX's "Intro" (or as Geo and Sabzi have dubbed it "Lumiere), one of my favorite songs of all time, and Geo wading his way through the small crowd and climbing onto stage to finish his verse. The show was in California, but you wouldn't have known it with every Seattle kid at the Claremont Colleges singing along at the tops of their lungs. A few weeks ago, I was at the Cinemotropolis release show at Neumos, and while the Scholars put on another sublime performance, it wasn't even close to as fun as the show in Claremont. The intimacy of a show by a group like the Scholars in a burning hot ballroom, in front of 200 or so adoring college kids cannot be matched.

Sources Cited: "Anarchy" in the NW

Posted by at Jun 30, 2011 02:55 PM |


The internet can be a confusing place. Thanks to its speedy nature, we're buried in more sources, more opinions, and more noise than ever before.  This means that good old fashioned reporting in the Information Age is a little bit like being a historian; the background and biases of primary and secondary sources need to be taken into account in order to paint an accurate picture. Over the next couple weeks, I’ll be pulling together takes on some local issues and events as reported by a variety of news outlets (from mainstream, to interwebbed). Hopefully it will clear some things up, celebrate good reporting, bring attention to the way different outlets choose to represent events and issues, as well as offer you loyal readers some resources - such as my expertly honed Google-Fu - to go about figuring out this big bad internet for yourselves.

"Anarchy" in the NW

In the midst of the revelry during Seattle’s pre-Pride Saturday night celebrations came a startling sight: five or so police cars driving an angry mob up Pine St. past 10th Avenue. There seems to be some confusion as to why this mob formed, and why they smashed up windows at the Broadway American Apparel and at a Ferrari dealership. Some reports say it was a flash mob that got out of hand. Others have been more inflammatory.

via KOMONews
Smashed windows and spray-paint at the Boadway American Apparel (via KOMO)

For a frozen-in-time look at how the story evolved, just look at KOMO 4’s preliminary report from the morning after next to the more recently updated version. Let’s compare the first sentences:

Hours after the event in question (posted 8:49 AM on Sunday), KOMO reported it thus: “Hundreds of anarchists create overnight havoc on Capitol Hill”

By the next morning, KOMO’s language changed to “Noisy mob creates havoc on Capitol Hill”

So what really went on that night? Did hundreds of anarchists flood the street and make their political opinions heard, as the first article stated? Or did KOMO adjust their story to fit a more detailed picture emerging from the internet?

First reports of an issue tend to be somewhat limited in scope, as their goal is to get information out quickly, rather than accurately. Over the weekend, new facts were discovered and KOMO changed the story to match them (you might also recognize the tendency towards sensationalism). By looking at the full scope of what the internet has to offer, we can see that the equation is pretty much this:

First Report + Time = Full story

As best I can tell, the gathering was inspired by this anti-corporate post on a Seattle community website calling for a midnight flash mob to celebrate Pride “with creation, rather than consumption”. Somewhere along the line, though, things turned ugly.

At midnight, the flashmob formed and started partying in the streets. Police cars showed up, and the demonstration took on a distinctly anti-establishment air. According to one bystander on The Stranger's blog (appropriately titled Slog)
, two men darted from the crowd and lifted up a police barricade, and it seems like that’s when the proverbial poo-poo hit the fan.

Along the way, the crowd busted windows at several local businesses and chanted some anti-police sentiment, before quietly dispersing.

Capitol Hill Seattle is reporting that the one arrest from the night was a transgender activist by the name of Maurice Schwenkler. (It should be noted that Schwenkler pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor back in 2009 for smashing windows at the Colorado Democratic Party headquarters.) So it does appear that anarchists- or at least “anarchists”- had something to do with the demonstration.

Though a popular anarchist message board claimed that the riot carried an anti-commercialization message throughout, user potatolicious (who says he was walking through the crowd on his way home that night) begs to differ.

“While I was craning my neck and looking around a masked guy came up (bandana on face), pulled his handgun out of his pocket (9mm? Didn't get a good look) and told me ‘It's the cops against the people, man! I'm gonna get me a pig when it all goes down.’”

Adds potatolicious, “these anarchists couldn't [care less] about any issue except...lynching cops.”

So in brief summary, about thirty “anarchists” smashed windows, following a crowd of about 200 partiers.

As all the facts began to come in and we learned that the riot wasn’t as widespread as was first assumed, Komo’s narrative transformed ever so slightly; you can look at the two articles side by side and very clearly see the difference in word choice. It’s an interesting little case study that shows how impermanent and organically changing the news is, especially in this day and age.
And because why not:

Hella Bus Writers Part 1

Posted by at Jun 30, 2011 12:30 PM |

Quick personal introductions to some of the brilliant, interesting, and really, really ridiculously good-looking writers who will populate the world of Hella Bus with all the political and cultural news you require this summer. More to come!


Arielle Paulson
Born and raised in Seattle, I am in an incoming senior at Whitman College where I major in politics with a particular interest in race and ethnic studies. I enjoy reading fashion magazines, watching crime shows, listening to hip-hop, and snacking. Usually all at the same time.


Gabe Meier
Last August, I left for Southern California to pursue higher education at a little place called Pitzer College, not knowing if I would ever return to the city I’ve called home my entire life.  With the added experience of living in a waterless desert, I have now returned to the city by the sea to resume my post as writer, photographer, and documenter of all things music and art. I love public transportation issues, and am a huge proponent of protecting basic civil liberties for all citizens.



Peter Johnson
I'm a freshly-minted college graduate. I am also crazy, because for some reason I want to get into journalism and fiction writing, which are dying and poverty-inducing professions respectively. This quixotic quest for clippings started when I was the go-to Hella Bus guy last summer.  I combat my existential crisis by playing bass, working part time as The Stranger's Unpaid Intern, and hanging out with Mitch Hedberg.



Sam Heft-Luthy
I’ve been the youngest volunteer in the room since my first Bus experience way back in 2008, and my time with Hella Bus is no exception. A rising high school senior with a summer birthday, I am the only Bus intern who won’t be able to vote come November. Despite this bitterly ageist setback, I’ve done my best to become an involved member of my local community. When I’m not sitting in the dark writing about local happenings or out in the sun experiencing them, I can be found watching and relentlessly making fun of bad movies, skiing (yes, even in the summer, what’s good), and biking.

Social Justice: The Transportation Discussion's Missing Ingredient

Posted by at Jun 30, 2011 11:43 AM |


Ever bake a cake, and leave out a key ingredient - sugar perhaps? Tastes terrible (Probably. I'm an insanely good baker). Or forget to add tapioca/flour/your thickener of choice to a fruit pie and end up with a soupy mess? (Again, I'm purely trying to imagine the problems that a lesser baker might encounter).

You see, oven-based neglect is not dissimilar to the predominant discourse on transportation today - it's missing a key ingredient:

When we talk about transportation we nearly always talk about sustainability, but transportation is also a social and economic justice issue.

For a timely example, see this Monday's front-page New York Times article about transportation. It turns out that Europe is on the forefront of establishing "more environmentally friendly modes of transportation." It's a lovely article, but focuses solely on environmental issues without drawing out the broader affects of public transportation.

So what's the problem? Well, when we make transportation a narrow issue, we get back a narrow demographic engaged in the discussion.  If we want to reel in a broader range of voices into the discussion of transportation policy, we need to acknowledge the broader role it plays in our life (see the Sightline institute for a great fusion of human and environmental approaches to transportation).

The ability to move yourself from one place to another is one of the baseline requirements of participation in our society.  You must be able to transport yourself from your house to your work, to school, to the store, to the doctor, to leisure activities (like baking camp*).

Even when we look at large-scale decision-making around transportation and development, it doesn't take long to spot the effects on the individual.

If we collectively decide that we're going to build car-focused infrastructure, then we're saying that the price of participation in our society is at least $8,500 per year on average (the cost of operating a car).*

If we collectively decide to require developers to build a set minimum of parking spaces with each new building, we're pushing the cost of development up, and ultimately, the cost that all of us pay for housing or at the store.

If we collectively decide that we want to maintain low housing density in our cities, we're pushing up the price of housing (via supply and demand), and making our cities unaffordable for all but the very wealthy.

If we collectively make a decision to underfund Metro, who does it hurt most? The people who count on it as an affordable mode of transportation.

Don't get me wrong--the environmental aspects of transportation are huge.  I love the fact that bicycling, bussing and walking are great for the environment, for health (I'm pretty convinced that the cure for our current obesity epidemic is to stop driving), for fun, for stress relief, and on and on...

But when the discussion is framed primarily around sustainability and skirts over the day to day human impact, a whole range of voices - most often those most directly affected by declining public transit - are pushed to the margins.

So just as a sugarless cake is only enjoyed by a small slice of folks (just kidding, no one eats sugarless cake), so too does a purely environmental discussion of transportation leave out important issues and voices. Those of us interested in funding public transportation would do well to open more avenues into public discourse by looking at it as a social and economic justice issue as well.

*Is there such a thing? Not that I need it. I'll refer you to my earlier comment about how really, really ridiculously good at baking I am.

*A little comparison shopping: Four full-cost, peak hour fares on Metro ($2.50), every day, 365 days per year, would come out to $3,650/year. I'm not sure what the yearly cost of biking is, but say you ride a really, really extremely nice bike for your commuting pleasure--a $1,500 bike for example. The bike lasts for 3 years, so that's $500/year. Throw in a generous $500/year for repairs, accessories, and of course spandex! Because spandex is essential to biking! That's only $1,000/year. And all that walking costs you is the price of a comfortable pair of kicks.

Hella Bus

Posted by at Jun 28, 2011 02:45 PM |

Your new Hella Bus Staff!

Now - as you know - the Bus has been working on the ground alongside thousands of powerful young people, organizations, community leaders, and good elected officials to move Washington towards a fresh era of politics since 2007.

Now, Hella Bus is bringing the good parties, good politics, and youth power to the world wide web.

We've been here (as in the mystical realms of the internet) for a while now, but today marks a distinct moment in our history. Specifically, we now have a fully staffed team of talented young folks (rather than one curly-haired guy in an attic) to bring you the best in arts, culture, politics, and the beautiful ways they interweave.

Today's media climate needs more platforms for thoughtful, authentic young voices, and Hella Bus aims to be just that. Nothing annoys us more than when major publications write about young people, but leave out our voice (and it happens all the time).

Ultimately, (and here's where the name comes in) we believe the world should be hella Bus - which means more informed, more inclusive, more youth-driven, more progressive, less self-satisfied/serious/involved, and much much more of a party. We're taking over the world, and having a good time while we do it.

On this here blog of record, we'll be sharing the Bus/youth/potentially your perspective so join the movement and let's do the dang thang.

Hella Bus: Bookmark it, RSS it, get at us on the Facebook, Twitter, apply to write next fall (email alex [at] washingtonbus [dot] org), comment away, and celebrate good times*.



Gentrification Roundtable on KUODUBS

Posted by at Jun 28, 2011 09:49 AM |

Check out the podcast of a very interesting, informative, and provocative roundtable on gentrification in Seattle featuring  the likes of former mayor Norman Rice, The Stranger's Charles Mudede, Eric de Place from Sightline, and Richard Morrill a professor of Geography at UW.

Listen to smart, smart people talking about very important stuff here.

Bus at the Boathouse!

Posted by at Jun 27, 2011 10:20 AM |

Friends of Drinks and Democracy,

You are cordially invited to join the Washington Bus for a summer cocktail reception at the magnificent Chihuly boathouse! Click here for tickets.  To RSVP and for more information please contact mallory [at] washingtonbus [dot] org.

More details below:


Can't wait!

Filed under: ,
Document Actions